Dec. 17th, 2004
(no subject)
Dec. 17th, 2004 02:03 pmDear physics;
When there is only one number for F and one number for m, we are going to get one result when we divide them. One. Not three. I need three. Pray tell, exactly how did you figure on this working at all?
so much hatred and disgust
Chris
How evil is it that, were I starting highschool next year, I'd be able to subsitute biology for physics. And have three years of English. I WAS BORN TOO DAMN EARLY; GODDAMMIT.
...I need more coffee.
When there is only one number for F and one number for m, we are going to get one result when we divide them. One. Not three. I need three. Pray tell, exactly how did you figure on this working at all?
so much hatred and disgust
Chris
How evil is it that, were I starting highschool next year, I'd be able to subsitute biology for physics. And have three years of English. I WAS BORN TOO DAMN EARLY; GODDAMMIT.
...I need more coffee.